Forums > Queen - Serious Discussion > Mr Bad Guy - Special edition

forum rss feed
Author

dudeofqueen user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 924 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 17 Oct 19, 16:42 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Day dop, re:

>It definitely sounds better.

How does a pile of shit sound better than a pile of shit? Maybe it's raining where you are and the sound of the water splashing on your bedroom window is - somehow - improving the sound. Perhaps that's where we've all been going wrong; if we converted each track in to a 192 Kbps MP3 file and then re-constructed the album.

Think you might just have stumbled on something......

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 17 Oct 19, 18:05 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Day dop wrote:

This made me laugh (because it's so fucking pathetic)...

runner_70 wrote:
Nice to have an evening with this amazing voice again. Since QAL I haven't listened to Queen very much because it always upsets me what they are doing now and I don't like Maylor anymore.


You protest way too much. You know you're never gonna get to suck Lambert's cock no matter how much you obsess over him, right?



You can keep your homophobic remarks to yourself you asshole

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 17 Oct 19, 18:06 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

It sounds patchy and totally flat. Especially IWBTLY's drums now sound like a cheap EDM beat you hear in lame disotheques. Surely not the way Freddie wanted it to sound.

aristide1 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 647 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 11:46 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Day dop wrote:

runner_70 wrote:
It sounds patchy and totally flat. Especially IWBTLY's drums now sound like a cheap EDM beat you hear in lame disotheques. Surely not the way Freddie wanted it to sound.

Again, you're still making the same backward claim ad nauseam.
No matter how many times you say the drums on the new version sound "flatter", it doesn't make it any more true.

Again, you're still making the same backward claim ad nauseam, that this thread is your sole property.
No matter how many times you vigorously reply to various "inconvenient" opinions, it doesn't make it any more true.

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 13:05 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Lol good one

cmsdrums user not visiting Queenzone.com
cmsdrums
Deity: 3773 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 14:21 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

K770i wrote:


Any Abba sound mixing guy would have made a better job 100%
Abba's production was always more superior to Queen's which is shocking as Queen were a rock band and Abba a pop group.



The same ABBA whose drums sound like cardboard boxes??

Not that I'm in any way agreeing with you that ABBA's production was superior than Queen's (some track-by-track instances might exist but the inclusion of "always" makes that a laughable suggestion), but why shouldn't a pop artist sound better than a rock group? Some of the greatest sounding records in any given era have been 'pop' ones.

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 15:12 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

This daydop guy is the most annoying tool after the AL loonies. It is like "My hamburger restaurant has the best meals on offer" - my gosh

dudeofqueen user not visiting Queenzone.com

Bohemian: 924 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 16:55 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

K770i, re:

>Abba always produced clean cut sound on there records, and no muffling like what Freddie has on his new edition of Mr Bad Guy album,

You do realise Freddie is dead, don't you? He's responsible for nothing other than the lyrics, vocal recording and title on the album re-mix.

Did you get a copy of the Queen MIH album signed by him too? Genuine rarity that.......

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 20:34 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Day dop wrote:

Another example (of many) of a rock album with ropy sound quality is Meat Loaf's Bat Out of Hell. I'm not a Jackson fan but Thriller is a far superior sounding recording. What about all the Lo-fi rock albums that sound like shit compared to well recorded pop albums?



BOOH has a ropy sound quality? What drugs are you on? It ewas produced in the 70's and has one of the best productions of this era. It is a legendary record production AND song wise.How could anyone compare it to Thriller? A pop album that came out years later where the recording equipment was totally different and the music is no pomp rock like Meat Loaf? You self called expert on sound are just a sad joke. I mean it. Pathetic really

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 20:35 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote


Other Queen albums that have decent enough sound quality are A Day At the Races, News of The World, and the sound quality of Hot Space isn't too bad either.


NOTW is the worst sounding Queen album after Jazz. They ent for a less pompous sound but the sound quality is very muddy

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 21:25 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Day dop wrote:

runner_70 wrote:


Other Queen albums that have decent enough sound quality are A Day At the Races, News of The World, and the sound quality of Hot Space isn't too bad either.


NOTW is the worst sounding Queen album after Jazz. They ent for a less pompous sound but the sound quality is very muddy


You are fucking clueless. News of The World doesn't sound "muddy" whatsoever. Fucking hell, you really have no idea. One could argue that News of the World is a little cold sounding, but "muddy"? No, far from it.

Queen albums with sound quality than News of The World (not including live albums).

Queen
Queen II
Sheer Heart Attack
A Night At The Opera
Jazz
A Kind of Magic
The Miracle
Innuendo

Again, that isn't about the music itself. It's about the sound quality, the recording of the album. How clear it is, how punchy it is, how separate the instruments are from one another etc etc etc. Stuff that goes way beyond your tiny brain.


You rally say Queen 1 sounds like Innuendo? You are a troll of the highest order - better to ognore you from now on as it is getting beyond pathetic

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 21:27 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Day dop wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

BOOH has a ropy sound quality? What drugs are you on? It ewas produced in the 70's and has one of the best productions of this era. It is a legendary record production AND song wise.How could anyone compare it to Thriller? A pop album that came out years later where the recording equipment was totally different and the music is no pomp rock like Meat Loaf? You self called expert on sound are just a sad joke. I mean it. Pathetic really


Bat Out of Hell came out in 1977. And it's well known that the sound quality on that album is poor.

1977, the same year as Fleetwood Mac's Rumours was released. But unlike Bat Out Of Hell, The sound quality on Rumour's is superb.

Dark Side of The Moon came out in 1973. FOUR YEARS EARLIER THAN BAT OUT OF HELL. And Dark Side of the Moon is regarded as one of the best rock recordings quality-wise out there.

Like I said, the idea that a pop recording can't or shouldn't be as good as a rock recording is absolute nonsense. Thriller is a much better recording than Bat out of Hell (again, it's not about the music, I don't even like Jackson's music. It's about sound quality).
Again, Dark Side of the Moon was released in 1973, and that is a WAY better recording than Bat Out of Hell.
So come again about Thriller? Do you see how fucking STUPID you're being yet again? How your brain-farts don't hold up under scrutiny? No, of course you don't. You never do.
It's as though you are incapable of differentiating the music itself and the sound quality. Why am I not surprised?
.
Despite yet another bullshit claim from you, that " You self called expert", at no point have I called myself an "expert". That said, I'm clearly more clued up than a complete idiot such as yourself. But it'd be difficult for anyone to be as bad (although you do have some competition here from the likes of aristide1).

I'm not surprised you think that Bat Out Of Hell has great sound quality, given that you've been clueless about everything else so far.

An uneducated thick as shit clown such as yourself with an ongoing unhealthy obsession over Adam Lambert is not in a good position to call anyone else "pathetic". You are a prime example of the very word.

You are just a sad shit stirring wankhole who compares Pink Floyd with Michael Jackson. I guess you own neither one record of both artists you sad dick


runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 21:44 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Day dop wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

You are just a sad shit stirring wankhole who compares Pink Floyd with Michael Jackson. I guess you own neither one record of both artists you sad dick


Incorrect yet again.

I made no comparison between Pink Floyd and Michael Jackson.

I also pointed out that Thriller - a pop album - has superior sound quality to Bat Out of Hell.

Then after your brain fart of claiming it was because Thriller was released later, I pointed out that Dark Side of the Moon - an album released FOUR YEARS earlier than Bat Out Of Hell - also has far superior sound quality than Bat Out Of Hell.

Derp!

And no, I don't own Thriller anymore. I used to, hence I know the sound quality on that album is very good. But you wouldn't have to look far to see what people think of the recording...

"Thriller’s cultural and commercial significance is well documented, but Michael Jackson’s masterpiece is also one of the best-recorded and most immaculately produced albums of the 1980s."

https://www.stuff.tv/features/50-essential-albums-audiophiles

As for Dark Side of the Moon, I own a few versions of it. The 30th Anniversary edition on vinyl, and the SACD. I also own the 2011 reissue.


Stop using your wikipedia knowledge you copy and paste. You are already a laughing stock no need to prove it anymore dickhead

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 22:18 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Day dop wrote:

runner_70 wrote:

Stop using your wikipedia knowledge you copy and paste. You are already a laughing stock no need to prove it anymore dickhead


Incorrect yet again. Find the part I quoted from Wikipedia. Of course you can't. You just spew horseshit.

Here's an idea...
Why not spend the next few years obsessing over Lambert and harassing his fans online?
Your life has been that pointless and meaningless for the last few years, so I'm sure it'll be that pointless and meaningless for the next few years too, if not for the rest of your miserable life.

I would say you're a laughing stock, but that'd be like laughing at a train wreck.


Those 3 loones harass themselves. It is more fun watching a troll being a luaghing stock like yourself. "Innuendo" has a worse sould quality than NOTW lol - funny shit

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 18 Oct 19, 22:28 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Because it hasn't you stupid dick. Anyone with common sense would say this. But live in your dream bubble - byebye

dysan user not visiting Queenzone.com
dysan
Deity: 5747 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 19 Oct 19, 09:34 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

As you correctly point out I don't have strong feelings either way so I feel I can assume the role of thread referee and point out that a couple of pages back you shared this link: https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/40/Appeal-to-Popularity


dysan user not visiting Queenzone.com
dysan
Deity: 5747 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 19 Oct 19, 12:21 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Aye agreed.

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 19 Oct 19, 15:02 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

K770i wrote:

DayDop Its taken 12 pages or dispute on this topic and yet you are still screaming from the rooftops about how punchier you think Mr Bad Guy is to the original.
Well that is your opinion, but its taken 12 pages of your drivel and you keep repeating again and again........ yawn yawn.........
Sorry if you think Abba are boring but Freddie loved them.

It is better to ignore that prick. Which is what I will do from now on. You should as well. AS soon as he has no stage for his drivel anymore he will use mommy's internet in his basement flat for other purposes than to troll on QZ


matt z user not visiting Queenzone.com
this message is...
matt z
Deity: 4754 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 21 Oct 19, 15:09 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

Well, ...

You can dance. You can jive, having the time of your life.


Derailed thread.

I haven't heard the entire album. The way I'm spending my money these days? I maY not hear it in the next 3 years


"Come tonight! Come see the Overbite! Come to Ogre Battle, FIGHT!"

runner_70 user not visiting Queenzone.com

Deity: 3579 posts
add to buddy list send PM

Posted: 21 Oct 19, 21:03 Edit this post Reply to this post Reply with Quote

K770i wrote:


Personally Justin Shirley Smith has butchered Freddie's brilliant Mr Bad Guy album, and should hang his head in shame.
Never make me boring, Freddie says, well they just have Fred !



Nothing left to say really. I listened to it once and doubt I will again